The Batch of petitions challenging the move of the Center to deport the Rohingyas, is seeing a high-voltage hearing from top legal Eagles, Fali S. Nariman, Kapil Sibal, Prashant Bhushan, Rajiv Dhavan, Ashwini Kumar and Colin Gonsalves. The Center has so far been represented by Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. It has to be seen that the center will rope in K K Venugopal of the attorney general if the temperature will rise in this case.
A bench, chaired by Chief Justice Dipak Mishra, will hear the case for detailed consideration of the central government’s affidavit till October 3. Initially, Dhavan and Bhushan urged the Bench to issue notice to NHRC, but CJI Mishra said before, We look at the legal situation. It will be very quick to issue a notice. We want to see that we have jurisdiction, what kind of jurisdiction do we have? “The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has already made it clear that it will oppose the government’s plans to deport the 40,000 Rohingya Muslim refugees living illegally in the country, when the center will submit an affidavit on the issue in the Supreme Court. The rights organization said on “Humanitarian Base” is against its exile and sent back to them, there is a plan to argue against the fear of harassment.
In this petition, two refugees Mohammed Salimullah and Mohammad Shakir had filed through Bhushan. In this petition, the Home Affairs Ministry, the National Human Rights Commission and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are the Respondents.
This petition relies on the report of a Reuters report dated August 14, 2017, in which it was revealed that the central government had told the state authorities that identifying and removing illegal immigrants, including Rohangya who faced the oppression in Buddhist-majority Myanmar have to go at present, about 40,000 refugees are said to live in India
The petitioner argues that the proposed exile is contrary to Article 14, 21 and 51 (C) of the Constitution of India. They further blame the violation of the principle of ‘non-reinforcement’, which prevents the refugees from being deported to a country, where they have to face the danger for their lives.
In the international law, this theory is suffering from bloodshed, oppression and violence in Myanmar and India is being prevented from exile, which will provide security to Rohingya community in the lives of the petitioners and other members.